Stress Therapy Solutions Educational Information Resource
Search:     Advanced search
Browse by category:
Contact Us

Research - Placebo controlled double-blind studies with EEG Biofeedback - Methods

Views: 8139
Votes: 0
Posted: 17 Feb, 2010
by: Admin A.
Updated: 05 Oct, 2013
by: Admin A.
The following discusses methods to produce a placebo EEG biofeedback experience for clinical research.  It describes some approaches that have been evaluated, and used, in the design of such experiments.  The intent is that, the same way that a pharmaceutical research study can use either the real medicine or a sugar pill, and the subjects do not know the difference, we want to provide either real EEG biofeedback or "sham" EEG biofeedback to subjects.  The purpose is to prove that the real EEG biofeedback really works, and that its benefits are not just due to the experience of sitting in front of a computer, thinking you are seeing your brainwaves, expecting it to work, etc.
The goal is to provide a basis to perform a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of EEG biofeedback.  There will be two matched groups.  The experimental group will receive EEG biofeedback training as a theraputic intervention.  The control group will receive an experience that is a placebo for this treatment.  This necessitates providing, as a control condition, an experience, for both the subject and the investigator, that is identical to real EEG biofeedback, yet does not have the proper operant conditioning cues.  In other words, the experience is indistinguishable from EEG biofeedback, yet learning is not able to occur, because the experience lacks the proper contingency relationship to the subject's EEG.  There are a variety of ways to provide such an EEG placebo.
One method is to deliver a random signal ("simulation") in lieu of real eeg.  The simulated EEG is a random signal that has frequency content and time behavior similar to EEG.  It looks somewhat like EEG, and it can provide essentially similar time behavior of feedback such as tones, videos, etc.  The aggregate rate of feedback can be set at whatever level is desired, to simulate a session with as much or as little reward as desired.  The trainee would be experiencing, instead of their own EEG, a signal that the computer generates, which is designed to seem like EEG to the untrained observer.  Such a simulation does not, however, have statistics and subtle time behavior that is identical with EEG.  Rather, it tends to be more monotonous, providing a steady amount of feedback at all times.  This potential monotony, and the fact that the signal has subtely different statistics from real EEG,  may be a drawback for this design.  Increasingly complex statistics, including time-varying statistics can be employed.  However, the challenge remains to demonstrate that the placebo is "in all ways" identical to real EEG, and this burden may be an unending one.
A second, and somewhat preferable method, is to use played-back real EEG, which is played back like a tape recorder, internal to the software.  The EEG would have been gathered previously from a different session, stored digitally on the computer using the BrainMaster software, and then played back through the software, in real time.  The playback has the same time behavior of the live EEG, including how many screens are updated per second, how the signal processing handles the data, etc.   Again, the appearance of the onscreen data and training screens is indistinguishable from real EEG.  The main advantage of this approach is that the subject is experiencing true EEG in time and in feedback, so that any subtle dynamics or variations that occur in real EEG will be present in the placebo.  In other words, the "experience" will be a true EEG experiences.
Therefore, the use of playback of real EEG is preferable, in that it provides a more realistic EEG experience for the sham operation, and minimizes differences between the control and the experimental condition.  The played-back EEG can be that of the same individual from a prior session, or it can be EEG from another person.  One drawback of playing back one's own EEG is that one might conceivable recognize patterns in it, and thus recognize that it is not real time.  Therefore, it may be desirable to cross-match subjects, so that a given control subject is presented with EEG that was gathered from either another control subject, or even from an experimental group subject.  By playing back EEG from a different individual, it is ensured that there is no way the subject could recognize the experience by recalling any details of the feedback.
A possible drawback with both of these methods is that the trainee would not experience the effect of artifact, such as motion, eyeblinks, etc.  Care will need to be taken so that this difference is not detected.  The subjects will need to be instructed to sit still, and if they move or do anything that would produce artifact, this event should not be noted in either the control or the experimental group.  If this becomes an issue, then a custom software method could be devised, in which either simulated or played-back EEG is combined with the users's own EEG, so that artifacts do make it into the signal, adding this level of realism.  There would be cost and time associated with implementing this alternative, however, and it is likely not necessary, with a thorough design and script.
In final design of an experiment, care must be taken to consider the computer displays and messages available to the operator, the subject, and any subject "coaches".  At various points, the software "knows" whether it is playing real EEG, played-back EEG, or simulations, and the double-blind design must ensure that such revealing information is not available to any of the blinded participants.  This may call for special considerations in layout of the lab, use of the software, and instructions to users.  In one study design, the subject and the investigator are in one room watching the "feedback" screens, while the actual control occurs in another room, by a person who is not blinded to the conditions, but who is blinded to the identities of the participants, and is also uninvolved in the study, and is merely an "operator".
One consideration with any of these approaches is the phenomenon of "learned helplessness" in control subjects who experience many sessions of non-efficacious biofeedback.  This can lead to a defeat of the learning mechanism in subsequent sessions when true feedback is applied.  This is a concern for control subjects whose first experience is a certain amount of sham experience, that they believe is a form of biofeedback therapy.  The subject's expectations play into this.  If they are expecting to improve and do not, then the learned helplessness can occur.  If the control subjects do not expect a benefit, but are merely experiencing the feedback for some other purported reason, then learned helplessness can be reduced or eliminated.
Any of these methods can be applied equally well to high-frequency, eyes-open protocols such as alpha, beta, or SMR training, and to low-frequency eyes-closed methods such as Penniston alpha/theta training.
Others in this Category
document Who is Stress Therapy Solutions?
document Where are the Brainwave Connections archives?
document Can I contribute an article to the STS Knowledge Base?
document Neurofeedback is Evidence Based for ADD/ADHD
document Washington Post Article
document Americanization of Mental Illness
document Case Study - Nancy Wigton 44 YO MALE
document Report from Tom Brownback regarding live Z-Score Training
document Case Studies from Dr. Fred Starr
document Case Studies from Dr. Joseph Guan
document Z Score biofeedback comments from clinicians
document Singer article on performance anxiety in dancers
document Case Study - Mark Smith report from NeuroConnections
document Case Report - Z-Score practitioner comments re. 4-channel training
document Contact information for Dr. Jeffrey Carmen
document Ryan session results
document Case study from Penijean Rutter and Bill Lambos - AAPB 2009
document Links to Collura et al publications
document Stanford University - Music, Rhythm, and the Brain
document Research - choice of 4-channel montage for quick assessment
document Testimonial by one of Dr. James Loong's patients
document Case studies from Dr. Jeffrey Tarrant
document Thornton Carmody Article - Biofeedback for Reading Disability and Brain Injury
document Hammond Article on Neurofeedback with Anxiety and Affective Disorders
document Case Report - Live Z-Score Training and Headache
document EEG Chicago Video
document Walker et al paper on module activation/coherence approach to QEEG
document Brown University Pilot Study - The Efficacy of Neurofeedback Training on Healthy College Students
document Gevensleben articles on Neurofeedback for ADHD
document Arns paper on efficacy of Neurofeedback for ADHD
document Brown University Progress Report - Alzheimer's and Live Z-Score Training
document Insomnia and Live Z-Score Training Results from Dr. Barbara Hammer
document Big Pharma pulling away from mental health
document Link to online video re: neurofeedback
document Heart Rate Variability Training combined with EEG
document Neurotechnology Reference Compendium
document Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence Cambridge Conference Links
document American Mental Health Counseling Association - Collura Power Point - Neurofeedback in Mental Health Counseling
document Neurofeedback and QEEG for Obsessive Compulsive and Related Disorders
document Neuroplasticity and Rehabilitation
document Large-scale brain systems in ADHD: beyond the prefrontal-striatal model
document Seizure Prediction in Epilepsy
document 10-20 Sites and their relationship to Brodmann Areas
document EEG as a Predictor of Medication Response
document Understanding the Mind Over the Video Game Matter
document EEG-based Personality Assessment
document Childhood Trauma, the Neurobiology of Adaptation & Use-dependent Development of the Brain: How States become Traits
document The Effects of Neurofeedback Training in the Cognitive Division of the Anterior Cingulate Gyrus
document Harnessing neuropasticity for clinical applications
document Vegetative state patients can respond to questions
document Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury
document Maturation of EEG power spectra in early adolescence
document 1,400 Assorted Diseases, Medical conditions, or Toxins that can cause, exacerbate, or associated with psychiatric disorders
document Resting state functional connectivity in addiction: Lessons learned and a road ahead
document Talamocortical Oscillations: Local Control of EEG Slow Waves
document Coupling between Intrinsic Prefrontal HbO2 and Central EEG Beta Power Oscillations in the Resting Brain
document Spontaneous Brain Activity Relates to Autonomic Arousal
document Publication of IEEE Recommended Practice for Neurofeedback Systems
document Emergence of Stable Functional Networks in Long-Term Human Electroencephalography
document Peri-ictal and interictal, intracranial infraslow activity
document Cerebral electromagnetic activity in the subdelta range
document Recovery of the default mode network after demanding neurofeedback training occurs in spatio-temporally segregated subnetworks
document Evidence-Based Information on the Clinical Use of Neurofeedback for ADHD
document Good vibrations: Oscillatory phase shapes perception
document Neurocognitive networks: Findings, models, and theory
document Clinical utility of paced breathing as a concentration meditation practice
document Alpha power, alpha asymmetry and anterior cingulate cortex activity in depressed males and females
document Self-regulation of brain oscillations as a treatment for aberrant brain connections in children with autism
document The emergence of abnormal hypersynchronization in the anatomical structural network of human brain
document Neurofeedback for the treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD: a randomized and controlled clinical trial using parental reports
document Tracking EEG changes in response to alpha and beta binaural beats
document Private Institutional Review Board
document Genetics and EEG
document QEEG and Neurofeedback for Sexual Offenders
document EEG tomographic neurofeedback for ADHD
document sLORETA with BrainAvatar Patent Infomation
document ISNR Issues Practice Guidelines for Neurofeedback
document Walker study on Neurofeedback for Anger / Anger Control
document Walker Research Articles
document Collura papers from Walden M.S.M.H.C. courswork
document ADHD Research in Germany
document Penijean Rutter Gracefire presentation on 9 Channel PZOK Protocol ISNR2011
document Recent Research on neurofeedbackand ADHD from Spain
document Walker article on neurofeedback for depression
document Links on Neuroanatomy, Human Connectome Project, Brain Atlas, Brodmann Atlas
document University Hospitals seminar on Neurofeedback
document Readings for QEEG Certification
document OCD and Neurofeedback
document Effects on Mood and EEG States After Meditation in Augmented Reality With and Without Adjunctive Neurofeedback Jeremy Viczko, Jeff Tarrant, and Ray Jackson
document Short-Form, Comedy Improv Affects the Functional Connectivity in the Brain of Adolescents with Complex Developmental Trauma as Measured by qEEG: A Single Group Pilot StudyMary DeMichele*and Scott Kuenneke