Skip to content
Get in touch

Research › Practitioner Perspectives

Whole-Head Normalization Using Live Z-Scores for Connectivity Training, Part 1

STS Instructor Authored by Thomas Collura

Share

Suggested message

Check out this Knowledge Base article from StressTherapy Solutions: Whole-Head Normalization Using Live Z-Scores for Connectivity Training, Part 1.

Facebook LinkedIn Email

Facebook doesn't let websites fill in your post. Use Copy message, then paste it in.

Article at a glance

Practitioner perspective. This article describes a clinician's own experience, cases or methods. It was not peer reviewed or controlled, so it can be subjective. Read it as practical insight, not as evidence that a treatment works.

Area
Practitioner Perspectives
Authors
Collura TF
Journal
NeuroConnections (April 2008)
Year
2008
Protocol
Multichannel live z-score training; Multivariate Proportional (MVP) combined z-score metric
Equipment
BrainMaster live z-score training (ANI z-score DLL); MINI-Q

Key findings

  • Draws on two years of clinical use of live z-score training with 1, 2 and 4 channels
  • Training a single coherence can disturb other connections; training many z-scores together is proposed instead
  • Four channels (for example F3-F4-P3-P4) give 248 z-scores and six connection pathways
  • Introduces a combined score (MVP); theory and methods only, no outcome data

The first of two articles in which the developer of a live z-score training system describes two years of clinical experience with it (since April 2006) and how the method changed. Training began with single z-scores and z-score ranges. It then moved to four channels, which give 248 z-scores and six connections between sites instead of one. The author argues that training one coherence toward normal can push other, untrained connections out of range. He cites a colleague's case in which conventional coherence training normalized the targeted links while others got worse, and links this to models of how the brain trades off short- and long-range connections. The proposed answer is to train many z-scores at once, across several sites, combined into a single "how normal" score (Multivariate Proportional, or MVP). It is a theory and methods article with no outcome data. The author has a financial interest in the equipment maker, and Part 2 (July 2008) covers the practical protocols.

Read it in NeuroConnections, April 2008 (ISNR archive), p. 12 →